Having failed to acquire a turntable at a reasonable price on eBay, I resolved to blow the remainder of my budget on a brand new one. About 10 years ago I owned a SoundLab SL1200 copy that wasn't too bad, so rather than trust my precious wax to something that might damage them, I decided to buy the same turntable gain.
However, the G056C has been through several iterations over the years and the current version is the G056F.
The first difference I noticed between the G056C and the newer F was a separate power switch rather than it being incorporated in the target light (as it is with a real 1200). Other downgrades seem to include a terrible platter (with totally useless strobe marks), a crappy slip mat, downgraded cartridge and generally poor build quality. The only discernible upgrade in the move from the C to the F designation is the addition of a line output (presumably there is now a pre-amp in there).
The chief commonality between the old C and the new F is that they run slightly too slow at 33 1/3 rpm and far too fast at 45 rpm. A series of tweaks of the potentiometers on the underside now means it turns at the right speed; but why they can't set this correctly at the factory baffles me.
Instant upgrades involved swapping the cartridge and stylus for the one that came with my old G056C (I threw out the faulty turntable but kept the headshell/cartridge purely on a whim) and bought a better slip mat. I have the tracking weight at a smidge over 3g so it's not going to do too much damage. Following these changes the reproduction is reasonable for a machine that only costs £90. Yet I remain disappointed by the G056F. Never has the old adage of "You get what you pay for" rung more clearly in my ears.
But bear in mind this turntable is within easy reach of 2 children under the age of 5 and I am quite sure it will be abused at some stage. A few years of using SL-1200s have raised my expectations of turntables, so this retrograde step was always going to disappoint; but it's better than finding my children have ruined a nice SL-1200.
Incidentally I have looked at the prices of new, old stock G056C machines on the Internet and they seem to be priced between £110 and £160. The C is definitely better than the F, but if I was spending £160 I would just continue to save up and get a SL1200 from eBay. A reasonable condition SL-1200 may be twice the price, but they are a hundred times better than the Soundlab in every single department.
I have also changed out the amp in the cheapo HiFi set up. I managed to obtain a Sony TA-FE370 for £21. Not only is this amp not damaged but it is contemporary with (and therefore matches the design of) my CDP-XE 370 CD player. The amp has a remote control that also works on the CD player - so the battered TA-F161 that started this whole thing is currently sitting idle.
Over the last couple of weeks I have also acquired a cassette deck for the princely sum of £20. However, the Sony TC-KE200 has proven so useful that it remains in my office set up and I will have to get another unit to go downstairs. If I can get another KE200 for around £20, my total spend will be £140 for a budget separates system. Not bad, not bad at all.
Showing posts with label CD Player. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CD Player. Show all posts
Cheapo HiFi Part 3: CD player overload
The third week of the "Cheapo HiFi Challenge" sees me hoarding CD players. I was always going to need another CD player as my computer is not kept in the same room in which I am setting up my new separates system. So, during the week I placed a few bids on devices that took my fancy and let eBay do the rest. Next thing I know I am the proud owner of a Technics SL-PG390 and a Sony CDP-491.
Now the Technics machine remains in the 'cheapo' bracket having cost me just £15. It has an optical output so is ideal to live in the upstairs set up with my computer. It works well enough and isn't in bad shape cosmetically.
At this point I must confess a predilection for retro Technics gear. I spent a large part of my school days in 1985 (and '86 and '87) leafing through Technics catalogues thinking: 'if only'. Whilst this particular machine is from much later than 1985, it still has that magical Technics badge that the 12 year me can't resist. Of course I am now toying with the idea of building a Technics system to compliment my SL-1200 MKII and new CD player. We shall see how that plan develops.
Anyway, back to the old Sony stack. I had decided to break the bank on a CD player with a remote control. Messing about with the remote-less CDP-XE370 was becoming a bit of a chore and when the CDP-491 (complete with instructions and remote control) came along, my head was turned. The 491 is a much older machine (circa 1990) than the CDP-XE370 (circa 2001) but it is higher spec (it must be, it has more buttons for heaven's sake). It seems a remote and instructions raises the price on eBay quite considerably and I ended up paying almost £40 for this one.
However, the majority of the extra functionality contained within the CDP-491 does not have much to offer in the modern era. This is because there are a large number of functions dedicated to recording CD to tape. Like the Technics machine, the new Sony has a 'Peak Search' function to scan the CD for the highest peaks on the disc to allow the user to set the levels on their cassette recorder. This machine can also fade tracks in and out and build a programme to fit a specified time. I would have killed for these options back in 1990 (particularly the fade options) but in 2018 they are pretty much redundant. For now that is...mix tape anyone?
Technics have arrived |
At this point I must confess a predilection for retro Technics gear. I spent a large part of my school days in 1985 (and '86 and '87) leafing through Technics catalogues thinking: 'if only'. Whilst this particular machine is from much later than 1985, it still has that magical Technics badge that the 12 year me can't resist. Of course I am now toying with the idea of building a Technics system to compliment my SL-1200 MKII and new CD player. We shall see how that plan develops.
Anyway, back to the old Sony stack. I had decided to break the bank on a CD player with a remote control. Messing about with the remote-less CDP-XE370 was becoming a bit of a chore and when the CDP-491 (complete with instructions and remote control) came along, my head was turned. The 491 is a much older machine (circa 1990) than the CDP-XE370 (circa 2001) but it is higher spec (it must be, it has more buttons for heaven's sake). It seems a remote and instructions raises the price on eBay quite considerably and I ended up paying almost £40 for this one.
The new CD with remote |
Watch your bass bins I'm tellin' ya
Recently I wanted to wanted to rip some CDs that had pesky copy protection. In the past I achieved this by taking a digital optical signal from a CD player into my PC; easy. However, 2018 found me bereft of any kind of CD player, a situation that I found surprising and a little alarming. I began to reminisce about all of the CD players I have known over the years and felt a desire to own another. Thus, I set out to find a cheap but reliable CD player with a optical output.
I managed to buy a fairly run of the mill Sony CDP-XE370 (missing the remote control) on eBay for the princely sum of £10. It arrived after 2 days and works fine - in fact, it's quite a nice sounding machine. The internet suggests this model harks back to 2001 and is capable of playing MP3 data - a good find it would seem.
Inspired by this success, I have resolved to build a Hi-Fi separates system for another part of the house solely from eBay. I have a tiny budget (I have challenged myself to not go into 3 figures) but absolutely no time limit.
To start to my 'cheapo separates challenge' I have cheated a little. I remembered that there was a pair of Jamo speakers in the loft that would get the ball rolling. Whilst a pair of vintage D115 cabinets aren't exactly the top of the food chain when it comes to speakers, they would suffice for my needs. However, when I pulled the speakers down into the light of day it appeared that 3 of the 6 cones had become bashed in over the years. Vintage Hi-Fi was obviously going to come with some maintenance obligations.
I have a distant memory of squashing the cones on my father's Acoustic Research speakers sometime in the late 70's. Surprisingly I don't remember getting a whack around the head or him being particularly angry. I do however remember him pushing a pin into the tweeters in an attempt to pull out the dent. This strategy did pull out the dent, but it also left an ugly hole in a very expensive and beautiful speaker. Thus, when I found these speakers I went straight to Google for solutions and not the sewing kit.
The first suggested remedy was to place a cardboard tube (say the inside of a kitchen or toilet roll) over the dent and suck the dent out. Needless to say, I didn't try this. Second option was to stick adhesive tape to the cone and pull the dent out. This method involves rubbing a pencil over the tape to ensure it has sufficient adhesion to the cone and then pull the dent out. With no pencil to hand I grabbed one of the many crayons lying around the office (the children play in there you understand, I am allowed to handle sharp objects) and got to work. Much to my surprise the first pull resulted in a 50% improvement and with a little careful application I was able to pull the whole of the first dent out. The much thinner, paper cone of the mid speaker did suffer some surface damage from the tape, but the dent was also fully removed. The second speaker responded well to treatment and after about 20 minutes work all of the dents were pulled out.
Now 20 years in the loft haven't done much for the looks of these speakers and some cleaning and minor repairs were required. I managed to find a permanent black marker in the same shade of black as the cabinets and touched up all of the blemishes that exposed the underlying fibreboard. I then pulled the plastic exhausts and had a good clean inside. All of the wiring and solders seemed good and once the dust covers were back on, these old Danish warriors (these are vintage speakers predating the switch to production in China) were beginning to look serviceable.
The only test that remains is to actually play something through them. I will be interested to see how they sound - not having listened to them for 20 years (I am making an assumption that they will work as there isn't much to go wrong with them).
I managed to buy a fairly run of the mill Sony CDP-XE370 (missing the remote control) on eBay for the princely sum of £10. It arrived after 2 days and works fine - in fact, it's quite a nice sounding machine. The internet suggests this model harks back to 2001 and is capable of playing MP3 data - a good find it would seem.
Inspired by this success, I have resolved to build a Hi-Fi separates system for another part of the house solely from eBay. I have a tiny budget (I have challenged myself to not go into 3 figures) but absolutely no time limit.
Barn fresh and bashed up |
I have a distant memory of squashing the cones on my father's Acoustic Research speakers sometime in the late 70's. Surprisingly I don't remember getting a whack around the head or him being particularly angry. I do however remember him pushing a pin into the tweeters in an attempt to pull out the dent. This strategy did pull out the dent, but it also left an ugly hole in a very expensive and beautiful speaker. Thus, when I found these speakers I went straight to Google for solutions and not the sewing kit.
The first suggested remedy was to place a cardboard tube (say the inside of a kitchen or toilet roll) over the dent and suck the dent out. Needless to say, I didn't try this. Second option was to stick adhesive tape to the cone and pull the dent out. This method involves rubbing a pencil over the tape to ensure it has sufficient adhesion to the cone and then pull the dent out. With no pencil to hand I grabbed one of the many crayons lying around the office (the children play in there you understand, I am allowed to handle sharp objects) and got to work. Much to my surprise the first pull resulted in a 50% improvement and with a little careful application I was able to pull the whole of the first dent out. The much thinner, paper cone of the mid speaker did suffer some surface damage from the tape, but the dent was also fully removed. The second speaker responded well to treatment and after about 20 minutes work all of the dents were pulled out.
Repaired and ready: the first part of the cheapo separates challenge |
The only test that remains is to actually play something through them. I will be interested to see how they sound - not having listened to them for 20 years (I am making an assumption that they will work as there isn't much to go wrong with them).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)