Showing posts with label Roland D-50. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roland D-50. Show all posts

One record at a time: 199. Jean Michel Jarre - Revolutions

"Revolutions" was the first album by Jean Michel Jarre that I bought when it was released. Neither of these records is my original copy as that was rather badly treated and did not survive the eighties. I bought the record on the right of the picture nine years ago from eBay as a replacement. The other copy was acquired about three years ago as I felt compelled to find a copy where the sleeve had the blue area in the upper right to match my original. Nostalgia compels us to do the strangest things. 

Nostalgia also explains why I own a Roland D-50. I think it is common knowledge that 90% of the sounds on this album are derived from a Roland D-550 which is the rack mount version of the D-50 (I also own one of those but it is in storage). Yet owning the synth that a musician used to make a record can shatter your illusions. 

My perception of Jarre was that he was a master manipulator of sound who spent hours creating new patches and textures using an arsenal of synthesisers. At some stage of his career this may have been true, but by the late eighties Jarre was happy to load up sounds other people had created and stick largely to one synthesiser.

Today you can find the data required for almost every sound used on "Revolutions" floating about on the internet. The first time you load these sounds into a D-50 it is easy to be awestruck at having the same palette as M. Jarre. Yet, it doesn't matter how much you try, you won't come up with anything as good or successful as "Revolutions". The skill Jarre exercises on this album isn't in creating sonic fireworks but as a master of melody and arrangement

The patch "Machine Run" opens the first track "Industrial Revolution: Overture" before synthesized strings begin to play a haunting theme. A D-550 'guitar' punches through with a terrific solo that thankfully sounds nothing like a guitar. The song winds down and creates a lazy start to "Industrial Revolution: Part I" before it suddenly kicks into a second movement that is something to behold. We blend seamlessly into "Part II" which features synth arpeggios and more D-550 sounds soaring up to heaven. "Part III" is a slower anthemic affair with an extended solo.

"London Kid" sees one of Jarre's heroes, Hank Marvin playing his distinctive twangy Fender. It's a memorable and upbeat tune that must have pleased both artists when it was completed.

On the flip side we hear a Turkish ney flute weaving a melody around Jarre's increasingly frenetic synth sequences before an electronic voice announces, "Revolution". Depending on which version of the album you are listening to, you might hear a different mix of this track titled, "Revolution, Revolutions". This newer recording was used after the person playing the ney sued Jarre as he didn't have permission to use the recording. I'm not a fan of the "Revolution, Revolutions" version as the drums sound weak and the orchestra seem to be playing in a different key. This original mix is much more satisfying.

"Tokyo Kid" has always fascinated me as it sounds so unconventional. Jun Miyake provides a stunning trumpet solo that perfectly compliments Jarre's brooding score. The D-550 comes to the fore again with "Computer Weekend" which is a light and airy tune played out on the "Ocean Scenario" sound from a collection of patches by a German company called EMC.

"September" is a noble effort but the vocals sound like they were recorded in a broom cupboard using the world's worst microphone. "The Emigrant" is a fitting finale but won't be making the running for any 'best of' compilations. 4/5

The 'live' minefield of Gary Numan

Along with my New Year's resolution to not buy any new music by Bjork, I have vowed to fill in some of the holes in my Gary Numan collection (and there are very many).

As a relative newcomer to the music of Gary Numan, the main thing that strikes me is the mind boggling number of releases. There are 20 studio albums, of which 5 have been released in two versions (extended and regular editions), the majority of his output from the Numa label has been released in a remastered/expanded form, there are untold number of compilations (especially licensed budget ones), lots of fan club CDs and bootlegs of every variety.

2004 and the new 2014 "Redux" edition of  'Electronic Pioneer'
The only thing that helps me keep track of what I own and what I am chasing is the Discogs website and my Numan bible: "Electronic Pioneer: An Armchair Guide to Gary Nuaman" by Paul Goodwin. This book is a good source of information and has helped me prioritise what I should buy. If you are drawn towards Gary's back catalogue, I'd recommend you track down a copy (it's screaming out for an index and colour images however).

But despite this book and all of the online discographies, the one area of Gary's back catalogue that mystifies and appals me in equal measure are his live recordings. Every studio album (and some compilation albums) seem to have resulted in a tour and an associated live recording being released. It is unclear if these live albums are released to recoup financial losses incurred on the tour (such with Jean-Michel Jarre's "The Concerts in China" or Mike Oldfield's "Exposed") or if Numan sees genuine value in releasing them. Personally, I can see little merit in some of these albums. The vocals on "White Noise" are indistinct and muddy. Paul Goodwin describes the version of "This Is New Love" included on this album as 'truly dire' - and he's being kind.

The number of Numan live albums is staggering
"The Skin Mechanic" is a clumsy, soulless journey through Roland D-50 presents (just like a few Numan studio albums). "Dream Corrosion" finds Numan at rock bottom with poor material and audio that doesn't even sound live. It's almost as if he sampled some crowd noises, rigged up his D50 (again) and sang his way though his back catalogue. "Dark Light" is a fine sounding album that is just let down by terrible artwork.

"Scarred" features more prominent guitar work but remains smeared with "Digital Native Dance" and other D-50 presets that had been out of fashion for 15 years by the time the record was released. "Engineers" was dragged out of the vaults by Beggars Banquet, dusted down and released almost 30 years after it was recorded. And as good as it sounds, I can't understand what it adds to the roughly contemporaneous Living Ornaments '79, '80 or '81. More recent offerings such as "Hope Bleeds" and "Replicas Live" are quite good individually but when considered in the context of Numan's back catalogue they just feel like overkill. Other recent releases such as "Jagged Live" seem to generate some debate as to whether it is was "live" at all.

"Ghost" is one album I am yet to track down (strangely from a tour held to promote a compilation album) along with "Telekon Live" and "The Pleasure Principle Live". I even want to acquire CDs that don't even appeal to me such as the "Fragment" albums or the recent "Big Noise Transmission". Why do I have this compulsion to own this stuff? What power does Numan posses? I must say I have noticed that his fans seem to be the most loyal, vociferous and devoted I have ever come across. Maybe, just maybe, he's beginning to exert this power over me.

Roland D-10: it's everywhere! (almost)

The first ‘real’ synthesizer I ever used was a Roland D-5 – it blew me away. Inevitably, the D-5 was soon stolen from our school and replaced by a D-10. I used this synth for various projects until I left school in the early 90’s

The D-10 isn’t the poor man's D-50 as its name would suggest; the two were very different machines. In fact it is a shame the D-10 has the ‘D’ prefix at all. The D-10 was a kind of early multi-timbral ROMpler that Roland began to perfect with the JV series in the 90’s. Even though it wasn’t much of a synthesis tool (changing the presets would incur a severe reprimand at our school) the D-10 had some nice sounds and was easy to operate.

Many years later when I had left school, I bought a second hand D-10 as it was familiar and, by then, cheap. Yet, I never really heard the D-10 presets on records and found I couldn’t quite get the sound I wanted from it (I was listening to lots of dance music in the early 90’s). I assumed the D-10 was just too ‘cheap’ for professional musicians and that I needed something more modern. I parted company with the D-10 around 2001 and haven’t missed it at all.

However, in recent years I am hearing the D-10 everywhere. Electronics’ “Lean to the inside” is almost completely Roland D-10 presets (actually a D-110 in this case) and the song "Idiot Country" features the Jamisen sound. 808 State used it for the lead sound on ‘In yer face’ and used various other sounds less prominently on their "Ex:el" album in 1991 (lots of Korg M1 and D50 on there too). The title track from Tangerine Dream's album "Lily on the Beach" features the drums and the preset HarmoPan and there are several other presets scattered around the album.

The most prominent use of the D-10 is probably by Mike Oldfield; his album “Earth Moving” features the D-10 on almost every song. Listening to the track “Innocent” I realise the drums, bass, and various other bits are all D-10 presets. I am at a loss as to why I never noticed the use of these sounds before.

The D-10 will never be a classic, but it was used by recording artists and there is evidence to prove it. So a synthesizer I dismissed as terrible (but one of few I could afford) is undergoing a re-appraisal.

Where is my phone? I need to look at my eBay app.
 
UPDATE MARCH 2023 - I've added a couple of other tracks I have noticed feature the D-10 and I have also recently acquired a D-110